1. Who
produced this document, and for what purpose?
Assistant editor Sharon
Ambrose of The Blaze Magazine. The
article focuses on the history of the educational plan of Common Core and
discusses the way it threatens America’s kids, freedom and future.
2. When
was this produced, and what was it's historical context?
April
2014 for the May Magazine issue. Sharon
explains what it will take to halt or change the federal school
curriculum.
3. Who
is the target audience?
Parents
and educators
4. What
are the messages communicated?
The
messages communicated explain how the common core curriculum provides students
with less independent thinking and creative opportunities for growth. It supports cookie cutter lesson plans that
keep our minds inside the box rather than outside, as we as teachers want to
encourage our students to become.
5. What
techniques are used to attract and hold attention?
The
magazine cover itself provides key terms and simple illustrations to captivate
our attention. Using the word
“collective” paired with the picture of all students in essence thinking the
same thing really gives the viewer a sense of uneasiness because to me it makes
us feel these students are all of one mind, like robots blindly following their
puppet master.
The
article states that Common Core is progressively the greatest weapon against
American freedom. This is a very
worrying statement and makes me question the direction of our societies
collective future greatly.
6. How
might people interpret this message differently?
Some
people may be swayed into thinking this collaboration of same ideas is
beneficial and uniting. Instead of
depriving us our freedoms to be independent, they may desire the outcome of
cookie cutter mindsets.
If
you value independence and creativity, like me you would be scared by this
magazine cover and article sneak peak and want to scream in outrage and
abhorrence.
7. Who
might benefit from (and who might be harmed by) this message?
Higher
ups in business and government would be the ones that benefit from this message
because it means our educational system is building armies of brainless peons
to do their bidding. Students and
teachers like me would be harmed by this message because we deeply value our
current freedoms and want to move away from standardized testing to estimate
worth and instead encourage and support risk takers, free thinkers and
dreamers.
8. What
information or perspective is left out of this message?
I
believe the teacher is left out of this message. Perhaps reasoning as to why “they” feel
common core is effective or ineffective as a future for education and where we
can imagine our educations system and students either benefitting or suffering
because of it.
9. Is this
an accurate and credible representation?
I
believe it is to a point. One does have
to do further research to discover the deeper creditable sources and
sites. I personally did not realize
common core was so scary. I have
standards that guide my creative instruction, but common core is less of a
concern for my art classroom than it is for English and other core
subjects. It looks that if this truly is
the future of education, that there may be even less room for the creative
disciplines in the curriculum, so I guess who knows if I would even have a job
down the line if we were to go to such extreme forms of instruction. I hope it doesn’t come to that obviously, as
I feel the creative disciplines are vital to students growth and future
happiness.
10.How does
this reflect the perspective or bias of its creator?
Obviously
the creator is against common core, so it has not been painted in a desirable
light. But “independent thinkers” can
make judgments for themselves based on the information and facts presented and
gather their own conclusions without being brainwashed to feel the same.
11.Describe
the text and subtext presented in this magazine cover. You can find a example
of what this means on p.5 in this Intro to Media Literacy
Project.
Text
– Magazine title “The Blaze.” Truth Lives here, May 2014 edition with Vol. 4,
No. 4 and www.theblaze.com. Collective –
Common Cores’ threat to our kids, our freedom and our future. There is a picture with elementary aged
students in a classroom facing a green chalkboard with their backs to the
viewer. The students are looking in the
same direction, either at the board or at their desks on their work. The chalkboard illustrates thought bubbles
out of their heads that lead to one unified bubble, which is the title grab of
the article the magazine is focused on here.
“collective” etc. At the top of
the page there are small explanations of teaser articles also included in the
issue for the viewer to be further drawn in by.
Possible
Subtexts – Our children all think the same.
It is important for our childrens future to think the same. Thinking the same is a good thing. Like minded thinking is the only way to
be. This is how our classrooms across
America look. This is what we want.
12.Starting
on P.6 of the Intro to Media literacy document there are 40 persuasive
techniques listed and described. Which ones are used in this magazine cover?
In my
opinion Fear is the only evident technique.
Your deconstruction is very different from mine. I can honestly say that as soon as I answered the first question, and knew the source of this publication, my opinion of the article was formed. I saw fear-mongering where you saw legitimate alarm. After completing the other assignments for this week, I do not fear the common core whatsoever. In fact, I learned that this is old news for a lot of other education systems in the world - particularly the successful ones. From what I understand, the common core does not herd educators into teaching students to be collective thinkers. Rather, it knits states together to have the same expectations of students and create more uniformity in our education system. Not only that, but the common core is totally optional (although incentivized), and 3 states have currently opted out (I found it interesting to learn that those states have all adopted standards that are remarkably similar to the standards found in the common core). If voters and politicians truly fear the common core, I have faith they will take steps to reject it as those three states already have. I think the true issue is that educators who are trying to meet these standards are reaching for third-party resources labeled as "common core-aligned" and doling out work from these resources rather than using the common core standards to create their own curriculum. Educators are STILL in charge of creating lessons, selecting resources, and writing the curriculum. The common core serves as a guide to help all schools get students to the same level of college and career readiness.
ReplyDeleteYour stance taught me that my own deconstruction may be biased at the core. However, despite my distrust of the political affiliations I still believe this magazine cover is designed to incite fear in the reader before they even know what they are reading about. Your deconstruction also made me pause for a moment and try to see the other side of the coin. Until I completed this assignment, I had no opinion on the common core. I am still making up my mind, but it is helpful to know that educated, open-minded people just like me are skeptical of this program. It’s important for all of us to understand and explore both sides of the issue.